1 PPTCvr2.png What Are Vulnerable Populations •The Emergency Management National Response Framework says “special needs” populations may have additional needs before, during and after an incident in functional areas, such as: –Maintaining independence –Communication –Transportation –Supervision –Medical care They are often constrained by: •Poverty •Physical or mental disability •Health issues •Low English proficiency •Transportation disadvantage •Age and especially by combinations of these. Elderly woman in room in chair with walker in front of her. 2 Starting Points forThis Work •Emergency communication planning too often is left for last, more so for people marginalized from mainstream communication •Pervasive Whole Community Preparedness is “by the people, for the people” –agencies can’t do it alone. •“Trust builds speed.” (Lt. Gen. Honorè, ret.) •Various agencies (public health,transportation, emergency management) can lead and any can participate. Tools Are Used to Build a Network •Many plans for comprehensive preparedness have been designed to connect authorities, agencies and providers. •An operational safety network gets closer to pervasive preparedness because it connects authorities, agencies and providers with people in their terms (their villages). People Have Their Own Connections •People live in self-defined villages with others they perceive to be like them in meaningful ways. Credibility and trust start here. •“Marginalized” doesn’t mean that people –even especially vulnerable ones --aren’t connected. To reach most of the people most of the time requires agencies to expand theirmargins and make connections. Impossible or at least hugely expensive? How can it be done? It’s all about collaboration Existing agencies-local and state government agencies, community based (CBOs), faith-based (FBOs) and non- government or non-profit organizations (NPOs) are already in the field working with many vulnerable populations. The Toolkit is a step-by-step process of getting into existing networks or setting up a communication network with other organizations that will help reach vulnerable populations What the Toolkit is –and isn’t •The toolkit doesn’t focus on activities or specific messages for emergency planning, response and recovery. •It lays out a process for building the collaborative partnershipsnecessary to communicate “X” messages and implement “Y” activities. Three interlocking circles: Vulnerable populations, transportation, and emergency management. Community based organizations (CBOs), Faith Based Organizations (FBOs) and Non-profit organizations (NPOs) are positioned between Vulnerable Populations and Transportation and Emergency Management. TCRP A-33 Report 150 is at the intersection of the three circles. Four Steps + Tools To Do Them •Executive Summary •Introduction •Chapter 1: Gather Information –Tools –Additional Information •Chapter 2: Build or Add to a Network –Tools –Additional Information •Chapter 3: Communicate Through the Network –Tools –Additional Information •Chapter 4: Sustain the Network –Tools –Additional Information •Conclusion, Glossary TCRP A-33 Communications with Vulnerable Populations: A Transportation and Emergency Management Toolkit 9 What the Process + Tools Can Help Agencies Do •Build a network of trusted individuals representing different population groups •Seek out connected organizations, as well as untitled leaders •Use “each one reach one” to achieve critical mass •Conduct “exercises” of the network in non- emergency situations •Respect the power of the functional message, messenger, and media Making This Work TCRP A-33 Communications with Vulnerable Populations: A Transportation and Emergency Management Toolkit 11 On a day-to-day basis, people that have full communications and mobility capabilities do not think about the people who may not. •Inclusive planning is essential. –Include representatives of and advocates for diverse groups of vulnerable people (not stand-ins!) in planning and exercises. Network members will help find volunteers! –Volunteers with service animals, mobility devices (from walkers to scooters), who have limited English skills, are deaf/ hard of hearing, blind / with limited vision, and with moderate cognitive disabilities will provide much more realistic trials and clearance times and will help figure out “what is missing” before the emergency. •All successful planning for emergencies is local. Some Barriers to Toolkit Implementation •Issues of who “owns” the process in communities •Resources: time, money, people •Transit recognition that communications planning is a necessary “asset” •Reluctance of community at large to face issues of poverty •Ability of local agencies to transfer national experience, guidance, tools to their localized efforts (because all effective emergency planning is local) confusingsignzc5.jpg THE WAY AHEAD For More Information •Website address •Deborah Matherly, Co-Principal Investigator, The Louis Berger Group, Inc. dmatherly@louisberger.com •Jane Mobley, Co-Principal Investigator, Jane Mobley Associates jmobley@janemobley.com